|
Vamsi Kodali |
|
|
I suggested this idea to the OOo developers some time ago. I believe no
one is working on it though (Unfortunately, I cannot contribute anything in terms of code). So, this is my second try. Hopefully, this time I will be more successful. As a researcher, I often use a lot of symbols and keep accessing the Insert > Special Character menu. I now have a button on the toolbar which saves me a click but it would still take me to special character browser where I have to pick the character I need. Since most people have only about a dozen or so special characters that they frequently use, I thought the button on the toolbar be changed to the one similar to a color picker which gives access to the several colors quickly. I have a mockup here:http://flic.kr/p/8Fj1FC Vamsi. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
2011/4/21 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>:
> I suggested this idea to the OOo developers some time ago. I believe no one > is working on it though (Unfortunately, I cannot contribute anything in > terms of code). So, this is my second try. Hopefully, this time I will be > more successful. > > As a researcher, I often use a lot of symbols and keep accessing the Insert >> Special Character menu. I now have a button on the toolbar which saves me > a click but it would still take me to special character browser where I have > to pick the character I need. Since most people have only about a dozen or > so special characters that they frequently use, I thought the button on the > toolbar be changed to the one similar to a color picker which gives access > to the several colors quickly. I have a mockup here:http://flic.kr/p/8Fj1FC > > Vamsi. Hello! Even if I also use special characters a lot, I think that this request is best suited for an extension than for a core feature. I use a lot an extension called "Compose Special Characters": http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/ComposeSpecialCharacters this extension have many predefined characters and permits you to insert others through their unicode value. Also, being a KDE user I have the "character runner" app... but that's another history. But I agree that the ability (either through a new feature or through an extension) to choose the most used characters and insert them on an easy way would be really helpful. Maybe if we arrive to a good specification someone will bring it to life :) Cheers Ricardo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
Jay Lozier |
|
|
In reply to this post by Vamsi Kodali
Vamsi
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 22:06 -0400, Vamsi Kodali wrote: > I suggested this idea to the OOo developers some time ago. I believe no > one is working on it though (Unfortunately, I cannot contribute anything > in terms of code). So, this is my second try. Hopefully, this time I > will be more successful. > > As a researcher, I often use a lot of symbols and keep accessing the > Insert > Special Character menu. I now have a button on the toolbar > which saves me a click but it would still take me to special character > browser where I have to pick the character I need. Since most people > have only about a dozen or so special characters that they frequently > use, I thought the button on the toolbar be changed to the one similar > to a color picker which gives access to the several colors quickly. I > have a mockup here:http://flic.kr/p/8Fj1FC > > Vamsi. > I like the idea of custom set of buttons for each user set up like the color picker. To best of my knowledge it not available in MS Office either. -- Jay Lozier [hidden email] -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
Jay Lozier |
|
|
In reply to this post by RGB.ES
Vamsi, Ricardo
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 21:49 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > 2011/4/21 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>: > > I suggested this idea to the OOo developers some time ago. I believe no one > > is working on it though (Unfortunately, I cannot contribute anything in > > terms of code). So, this is my second try. Hopefully, this time I will be > > more successful. > > > > As a researcher, I often use a lot of symbols and keep accessing the Insert > >> Special Character menu. I now have a button on the toolbar which saves me > > a click but it would still take me to special character browser where I have > > to pick the character I need. Since most people have only about a dozen or > > so special characters that they frequently use, I thought the button on the > > toolbar be changed to the one similar to a color picker which gives access > > to the several colors quickly. I have a mockup here:http://flic.kr/p/8Fj1FC > > > > Vamsi. > > Hello! > Even if I also use special characters a lot, I think that this request > is best suited for an extension than for a core feature. > I use a lot an extension called "Compose Special Characters": > http://extensions.services.openoffice.org/project/ComposeSpecialCharacters > this extension have many predefined characters and permits you to > insert others through their unicode value. Also, being a KDE user I > have the "character runner" app... but that's another history. > But I agree that the ability (either through a new feature or through > an extension) to choose the most used characters and insert them on an > easy way would be really helpful. > Maybe if we arrive to a good specification someone will bring it to life :) > Cheers > Ricardo > I would like to help draft a specifications for this. I think the mock up is a good visual start. Any thoughts? Who would we forward the specifications? -- Jay Lozier [hidden email] -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
>> Even if I also use special characters a lot, I think that this request >> is best suited for an extension than for a core feature. I am not sure if I agree with that, but I will happily settle with an extension :-) > I would like to help draft a specifications for this. I think the mock > up is a good visual start. > > Any thoughts? Who would we forward the specifications? That would be great! I can also 'help'. I have never drafted any specifications so I am not sure what it entails but I can follow instructions pretty well... Here is another mockup that I made. http://flic.kr/p/9AxzF9 It shows what I envision happens when someone clicks on the special character toolbar button. The table of symbols looks a little large because I basically used the current dialog box but we can decrease the size a little bit in the working version. For comparison, here's what the font color chooser looks like currently http://flic.kr/p/9AxCzu -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
2011/4/21 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>:
> >>> Even if I also use special characters a lot, I think that this request >>> is best suited for an extension than for a core feature. > I am not sure if I agree with that, but I will happily settle with an extension :-) > >> I would like to help draft a specifications for this. I think the mock >> up is a good visual start. >> >> Any thoughts? Who would we forward the specifications? > > That would be great! I can also 'help'. I have never drafted any specifications so I am not sure what it entails but I can follow instructions pretty well... > > Here is another mockup that I made. http://flic.kr/p/9AxzF9 It shows what I envision happens when someone clicks on the special character toolbar button. The table of symbols looks a little large because I basically used the current dialog box but we can decrease the size a little bit in the working version. For comparison, here's what the font color chooser looks like currently http://flic.kr/p/9AxCzu > > I'm thinking now on something more "complex", a sort of evolution from ComposeSpecialCharacter extension that can be called QuickSymbol: suppose a menu where you can select your more used symbols, put them on a table and assign to them an "alias", something like b for β, etc. Now, suppose that this QuickSymbol have a keyboard shortcut assigned, something like Alt+C: then, if you in the text type b and them press Alt+C the b is replaced by β. The main advantage from Compose... is, clearly, the ability to choose your own preferred symbols and to choose your preferred alias, so you do not need to rely on a predefined and not possible to edit replacement table full of symbols that you probably do not need. What do your think? Cheers Ricardo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
> I'm thinking now on something more "complex", a sort of evolution from
> ComposeSpecialCharacter extension that can be called QuickSymbol: > suppose a menu where you can select your more used symbols, put them > on a table and assign to them an "alias", something like b for β, etc. > Now, suppose that this QuickSymbol have a keyboard shortcut assigned, > something like Alt+C: then, if you in the text type b and them press > Alt+C the b is replaced by β. The main advantage from Compose... is, > clearly, the ability to choose your own preferred symbols and to > choose your preferred alias, so you do not need to rely on a > predefined and not possible to edit replacement table full of symbols > that you probably do not need. > What do your think? Your idea is definitely more quicker than going to a menu and clicking on buttons. In fact, my current workaround to insert frequently used symbols quickly into a text is by utilizing the AutoCorrect options. The ComposeSpecialCharacter and QuickSymbol approaches, although more specialized, sound similar to the AutoCorrect method. But the problem with those approaches is that the user is required to remember shortcuts and these features may be a little hard to discover. We still keep the Cut/Copy/Paste/Undo/Redo buttons in spite of their popularity, right? -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
2011/4/22 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>:
>> I'm thinking now on something more "complex", a sort of evolution from >> ComposeSpecialCharacter extension that can be called QuickSymbol: >> suppose a menu where you can select your more used symbols, put them >> on a table and assign to them an "alias", something like b for β, etc. >> Now, suppose that this QuickSymbol have a keyboard shortcut assigned, >> something like Alt+C: then, if you in the text type b and them press >> Alt+C the b is replaced by β. The main advantage from Compose... is, >> clearly, the ability to choose your own preferred symbols and to >> choose your preferred alias, so you do not need to rely on a >> predefined and not possible to edit replacement table full of symbols >> that you probably do not need. >> What do your think? > > Your idea is definitely more quicker than going to a menu and clicking on buttons. In fact, my current workaround to insert frequently used symbols quickly into a text is by utilizing the AutoCorrect options. The ComposeSpecialCharacter and QuickSymbol approaches, although more specialized, sound similar to the AutoCorrect method. > > But the problem with those approaches is that the user is required to remember shortcuts and these features may be a little hard to discover. We still keep the Cut/Copy/Paste/Undo/Redo buttons in spite of their popularity, right? > Right ;) But that does not means we do not have keyboard shortcuts. Maybe the ideal situation would be to implement both aspect: an easy symbol menu and an easy "insert my preferred symbols" method. Cheers Ricardo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
Jay Lozier |
|
|
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:54 +0200, RGB ES wrote:
> 2011/4/22 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>: > >> I'm thinking now on something more "complex", a sort of evolution from > >> ComposeSpecialCharacter extension that can be called QuickSymbol: > >> suppose a menu where you can select your more used symbols, put them > >> on a table and assign to them an "alias", something like b for β, etc. > >> Now, suppose that this QuickSymbol have a keyboard shortcut assigned, > >> something like Alt+C: then, if you in the text type b and them press > >> Alt+C the b is replaced by β. The main advantage from Compose... is, > >> clearly, the ability to choose your own preferred symbols and to > >> choose your preferred alias, so you do not need to rely on a > >> predefined and not possible to edit replacement table full of symbols > >> that you probably do not need. > >> What do your think? > > > > Your idea is definitely more quicker than going to a menu and clicking on buttons. In fact, my current workaround to insert frequently used symbols quickly into a text is by utilizing the AutoCorrect options. The ComposeSpecialCharacter and QuickSymbol approaches, although more specialized, sound similar to the AutoCorrect method. > > > > But the problem with those approaches is that the user is required to remember shortcuts and these features may be a little hard to discover. We still keep the Cut/Copy/Paste/Undo/Redo buttons in spite of their popularity, right? > > > > Right ;) But that does not means we do not have keyboard shortcuts. > Maybe the ideal situation would be to implement both aspect: an easy > symbol menu and an easy "insert my preferred symbols" method. > Cheers > Ricardo > What if allow the user assign the shortcut, may be they have to use Alt instead of Ctrl? The assignment is made by what mnemonic method the user wants to use, if they want to use any. I tend to use a few shortcuts myself but others love them. This avoids have preassigned shortcuts the user may hate. -- Jay Lozier [hidden email] -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
|
|
2011/4/23 planas <[hidden email]>:
> On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 16:54 +0200, RGB ES wrote: > >> 2011/4/22 Vamsi Kodali <[hidden email]>: >> >> I'm thinking now on something more "complex", a sort of evolution from >> >> ComposeSpecialCharacter extension that can be called QuickSymbol: >> >> suppose a menu where you can select your more used symbols, put them >> >> on a table and assign to them an "alias", something like b for β, etc. >> >> Now, suppose that this QuickSymbol have a keyboard shortcut assigned, >> >> something like Alt+C: then, if you in the text type b and them press >> >> Alt+C the b is replaced by β. The main advantage from Compose... is, >> >> clearly, the ability to choose your own preferred symbols and to >> >> choose your preferred alias, so you do not need to rely on a >> >> predefined and not possible to edit replacement table full of symbols >> >> that you probably do not need. >> >> What do your think? >> > >> > Your idea is definitely more quicker than going to a menu and clicking on buttons. In fact, my current workaround to insert frequently used symbols quickly into a text is by utilizing the AutoCorrect options. The ComposeSpecialCharacter and QuickSymbol approaches, although more specialized, sound similar to the AutoCorrect method. >> > >> > But the problem with those approaches is that the user is required to remember shortcuts and these features may be a little hard to discover. We still keep the Cut/Copy/Paste/Undo/Redo buttons in spite of their popularity, right? >> > >> >> Right ;) But that does not means we do not have keyboard shortcuts. >> Maybe the ideal situation would be to implement both aspect: an easy >> symbol menu and an easy "insert my preferred symbols" method. >> Cheers >> Ricardo >> > > What if allow the user assign the shortcut, may be they have to use Alt > instead of Ctrl? The assignment is made by what mnemonic method the user > wants to use, if they want to use any. I tend to use a few shortcuts > myself but others love them. This avoids have preassigned shortcuts the > user may hate. > -- > Jay Lozier > [hidden email] > Of course! I just named Alt+C as an example (that's the shortcut I use for Compose... extension) Cheers Ricardo -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to [hidden email] Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |