|
|
Hi.
I stumbled upon Cobra – WinLDTP, Windows version of Linux Desktop Testing Project open sourced by VMWare recently. Using this tool, the GUI functionality of an application can be tested in Windows XP SP3, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8 development release. Libre/OpenOffice is mentioned. Did anybody used LDTP in the past to perform functional, regression testing? More info at http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki. Best regards. P.S. There are traces of automation at wiki.documentfoundation.org: - smoketest has to be done before any beta or rc build is announced - full regression test has to be done before every major release - basic regression test should be done also before every bug fix release What is the status of those? Are they executed before each release? Any dashboards available? |
|
Michael Stahl-2 |
|
|
hi bfo,
On 25/06/12 23:40, bfo wrote: > I stumbled upon Cobra – WinLDTP, Windows version of Linux Desktop Testing > Project open sourced by VMWare > recently. Using this tool, the GUI functionality of an application can be > tested in Windows XP SP3, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8 development release. > Libre/OpenOffice is mentioned. Did anybody used LDTP in the past to perform > functional, regression testing? More info at > http://ldtp.freedesktop.org/wiki. this sounds very interesting, especially this: > It uses the Accessibility libraries to discover through the application's user interface. that sounds like the ideal approach to UI testing for me, as it would automatically test the accessibility interface as well, which is something that i'm pretty sure nobody tests by hand, so if there are regressions there they won't be noticed. > Linux version is LDTP, Windows version is Cobra and Mac version is PyATOM (Work in progress). can all of these execute the same tests? surely writing tests 3 times is not the way to go. btw, i'm not sure if you know this, but there used to be a VCL testtool in the OOo code base, which was developed by the Sun Hamburg QA department to do automated UI testing; this tool had serious problems, such as timing issues requiring to manually litter the tests with sleeps, so as machines got faster the tests would leave the CPU mostly idle and take days to run; also i have it on good account that the QA department actually used a testtool binary built in 2007 and never upgraded that to the current OOo code later, which does not exactly instil confidence; testtool was removed from LibreOffice because it was decided that this is clearly not maintainable. i wonder what AOO uses for UI testing; perhaps IBM has some internal thing for that. > Best regards. > P.S. > There are traces of automation at wiki.documentfoundation.org: > - smoketest has to be done before any beta or rc build is announced the smoketest (as well as many other automated tests) can be run during the build simply by calling "make check", and i would hope that our release builds are built that way. > - full regression test has to be done before every major release > - basic regression test should be done also before every bug fix release > What is the status of those? Are they executed before each release? Any > dashboards available? i wonder what "regression test" means here? manual tests, or does it refer to testtool? _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [hidden email] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ |
|
|
"With LDTP and WinLDTP, the script API part will be the same. The only places where the script writer has to update things would be like - when the widget types between both the platforms are different or the UI object label is different" More informations: news article - http://news.efytimes.com/e1/82073/VMWare-Open-Sources--Windows-Version-Of-Linux-Desktop-Testing-Project developer's blog - http://nagappanal.blogspot.com/ I have found the following resources: https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/release-qa-plan.html http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance http://www.mail-archive.com/ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org/msg20994.html Are results of such tests available anywhere? I got it from this article: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests |
|
Markus Mohrhard |
|
|
>> i wonder what AOO uses for UI testing; perhaps IBM has some internal
>> thing for that. >> > I have found the following resources: > https://cwiki.apache.org/OOOUSERS/release-qa-plan.html > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Quality_Assurance > http://www.mail-archive.com/ooo-dev@.../msg20994.html > > The last thing I heard about it is that they are now using it already. I did not yet have time to look into it and sadly it is another java based test framework. I plan to have at least a look at it after the 3-6 release. Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [hidden email] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |