[Libreoffice-qa] Online update in 3.6

Hi Klaus-Juergen, all,

I have enabled the online update service for the 3.6 line now too - can
you please test?  To test, please install the 3.6 Beta1, and choose
'Help' -> 'Check for Updates...' - it should offer you the Beta2 :-)

Please report back any issues.  Thank you in advance!

All the best,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Kendy,
Am 27.06.2012 18:12, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
> Hi Klaus-Juergen, all,
>
> I have enabled the online update service for the 3.6 line now too - can
> you please test?  To test, please install the 3.6 Beta1, and choose
> 'Help' -> 'Check for Updates...' - it should offer you the Beta2 :-)

Version 3.6.0beta1 (Build ID: 1f1cdd8) VISTA 32bit

"LOdev 3.6 ist auf dem neuesten Stand."

> Please report back any issues.  Thank you in advance!

So I don't get Beta2.

Grüße
k-j

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Klaus-Juergen,

On 2012-06-27 at 20:02 +0200, ol klaus-jürgen weghorn wrote:

> > Please report back any issues.  Thank you in advance!
>
> So I don't get Beta2.

Oh!  A small glitch, it really should work now :-) - can you please
check?

Thank you a lot,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Kendy,

Am 27.06.12 18:12, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
> I have enabled the online update service for the 3.6 line now too - can
> you please test?  To test, please install the 3.6 Beta1, and choose
> 'Help' -> 'Check for Updates...' - it should offer you the Beta2 :-)

I tried some minutes ago, and on MacOS X 10.6.8, it works fine -- it
offers me Beta 2, and even selects the right (German) download page. Thanks!

Roman
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Kendy,
Am 28.06.2012 08:45, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
Works now on WIN8beta and Beta1..


--
Grüße
k-j


_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Am 28.06.2012 08:45, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
grouchy

No LODev3.6 Beta3


--
Grüße
k-j


_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hello Thorsten, Kendy, all,

On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:11 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
<[hidden email]> wrote:
> No LODev3.6 Beta3

I've created and attached a patch at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51858.
Please push and deploy it. Thanks! :-)

Best Regards,
--
Korrawit Pruegsanusak
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Korrawit Pruegsanusak píše v Ne 08. 07. 2012 v 12:47 +0700:
> Hello Thorsten, Kendy, all,
>
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:11 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
> <[hidden email]> wrote:
> > No LODev3.6 Beta3

I have just enabled it. Please, test.


> I've created and attached a patch at
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51858.
> Please push and deploy it. Thanks! :-)

Ah, I have missed your mail, so I did not use the patch. Anyway, we will
need the second part later this week if 3.5.5-rc3 is final.


Best Regards,
Petr

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Petr,
Am 09.07.2012 11:06, schrieb Petr Mladek:
> Korrawit Pruegsanusak píše v Ne 08. 07. 2012 v 12:47 +0700:
>> Hello Thorsten, Kendy, all,
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 4:11 AM, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
>> <[hidden email]> wrote:
>>> No LODev3.6 Beta3
>
> I have just enabled it. Please, test.

Works, thanks.

> Ah, I have missed your mail, so I did not use the patch. Anyway, we will
> need the second part later this week if 3.5.5-rc3 is final.

So we will test it when it is announced officially.


--
Grüße
k-j


_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Petr, Kendy,
Am 09.07.2012 12:31, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
No 3.6 RC2
My Version 3.6.0.1 (Build ID: 73f9fb6) is on "neuester Stand".


--
Grüße
k-j
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Good morning Jan,
 > Am 09.07.2012 12:31, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:

> No 3.6 RC2
> My Version 3.6.0.1 (Build ID: 73f9fb6) is on "neuester Stand".

"LibreOffice 3.6.0 RC2 ist verfügbar."
No 3.6.0.4.



--
Grüße
k-j
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Jan,
Am 30.07.2012 08:39, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
> Good morning Jan,
>  > Am 09.07.2012 12:31, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
>
>> No 3.6 RC2
>> My Version 3.6.0.1 (Build ID: 73f9fb6) is on "neuester Stand".
>
> "LibreOffice 3.6.0 RC2 ist verfügbar."
> No 3.6.0.4.

Have you forgotten me? ;-)

--
Grüße
k-j
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Kendy, all

Isn't there some way for you to create a script that runs daily and checks if the file that is on
http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/
is already uploaded to some reference mirror (meaning that it was already announced)?

Then the script would update the information on the update check engine...

This could also apply to stable releases (thus moving another step for people being allowed to choose development updates or just stable updates)

Maybe this idea is stupid and there is a better way to automate this...

And, no Michael (et al), I don't have a patch or code to provide. This is just an idea/suggestion. If it is not welcome, just ignore it.

Regards,
Pedro

Hi Jan,

Am 31.07.2012 12:33, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
If we want to release 3.6.0.4 as stable we should check the online
update before. There is still no online update to 3.6.0.4.

--
Grüße
k-j
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Klaus-Jürgen,

On 2012-08-03 at 08:03 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:

> If we want to release 3.6.0.4 as stable we should check the online
> update before. There is still no online update to 3.6.0.4.

I am sorry, it has been a terribly busy week :-(  Fixed now, the update
to RC4 should be offered.  Thanks again for the testing!

All the best,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Jan,
Am 03.08.2012 10:04, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
> Hi Klaus-Jürgen,
>
> On 2012-08-03 at 08:03 +0200, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote:
>
>> If we want to release 3.6.0.4 as stable we should check the online
>> update before. There is still no online update to 3.6.0.4.
>
> I am sorry, it has been a terribly busy week :-(

No problem. Maybe we/you can do such a script as Pedro mentioned to
relieve you for this point.

>  Fixed now, the update
> to RC4 should be offered.  Thanks again for the testing!

Works. Thanks.


--
Grüße
k-j
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

2012.08.03 11:37, klaus-jürgen weghorn ol rašė:
> Hi Jan,
> Am 03.08.2012 10:04, schrieb Jan Holesovsky:
>
>>  Fixed now, the update
>> to RC4 should be offered.  Thanks again for the testing!
>
> Works. Thanks.


Hi,

the update string is somewhat fuzzy though: for me it says I have
3.6.0.2 installed, and the update is 3.6.0 RC4. I know that the laste
digit is the RC number,  but still I think it would be nicer if same
numbering scheme was used for both version numbers.

Rimas

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Jan Holesovsky schrieb:

> I am sorry, it has been a terribly busy week :-(  Fixed now, the update
> to RC4 should be offered.  Thanks again for the testing!
>

Hi,

I did a quick test and recommendations weem to work in a perfect way:
- 3.5 users should update to 3.5.5
- 3.6 testers should update to 3.6.0.4

The version info in the updater dialog IMHO is incomplete:
The Version with what I tested is correctly shown as 3.6.0.0.beta3, but
the recommended download shows 3.6.0 RC4, what is not wrong, but the
complete Version name is 3.6.0.4.

I do not know whether there is an agreement how to call those versions,
I understood that we avoid "RC" and "Release" anywhere except as
additional information in the Bugzilla Version pickers.


Best regards


Rainer
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Hi Rainer,

On 2012-08-03 at 12:19 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

> > I am sorry, it has been a terribly busy week :-(  Fixed now, the update
> > to RC4 should be offered.  Thanks again for the testing!
>
> I did a quick test and recommendations weem to work in a perfect way:
> - 3.5 users should update to 3.5.5
> - 3.6 testers should update to 3.6.0.4

Great, thanks!

> The version info in the updater dialog IMHO is incomplete:
> The Version with what I tested is correctly shown as 3.6.0.0.beta3, but
> the recommended download shows 3.6.0 RC4, what is not wrong, but the
> complete Version name is 3.6.0.4.
>
> I do not know whether there is an agreement how to call those versions,
> I understood that we avoid "RC" and "Release" anywhere except as
> additional information in the Bugzilla Version pickers.

I plan to remove the RC information from there when the 3.6 is final,
and will present just 3.6.0 in the update dialog.  I think the testers
of the pre-release versions know what is going on, and the real users
will not see that, so I hope we are good :-)

All the best,
Kendy

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [hidden email]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Jan Holesovsky wrote

I plan to remove the RC information from there when the 3.6 is final,
and will present just 3.6.0 in the update dialog.  I think the testers
of the pre-release versions know what is going on, and the real users
will not see that, so I hope we are good :-)

Remove manually?

Wouldn't it be easier to have a table on the server like

Version RC
3.5.4.1 True
3.5.4.2 False
etc
3.6.0.4 True

When 3.6.0.4 (or any RC) changes to Release you just need a script that compares the CRC or MD5 or whatever of the RC to the Stable build and changes True to False.

This would also allow a user which hasn't updated his 3.5.4.1 build to get some information. E.g.

"The installed version is LibreOffice 3.5.4.1 which is a Release Candidate
The latest stable release for the 3.5 branch is version 3.5.5.3
The latest release candidate for the 3.5 branch is version 3.5.6.1
The "bleeding edge" release candidate is version 3.6.0.4

 (why do you insist on hiding the last digit in the Update dialog???)

My suggestion is that someone who is running an RC version (checked against the list on the server) is probably interested in other RCs. However this could be manually changed in some setting?

Just more thoughts... I hope someone finds them interesting enough...

Regards,
Pedro