Quantcast

Testing 3.6.0alpha1

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
5 messages Options
Rainer Bielefeld-2 Rainer Bielefeld-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi,

we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
that version because of  “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we
will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.

What do you think about an alpha2?

More details and a poll here:
<http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/>


Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by
comment in the blog!

Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2.

Best regards

Rainer
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
David Ostrovsky David Ostrovsky
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

[PATCH] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Hi,

On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
> that version because of  “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we
> will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.
>
I looked at it and it turns out, that it is failing in
jvmfwk/source/fwkbase.cxx:181 with:

The file: vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll
does not exist."
But the Library is called sunjavaplugin.dll and not libsunjavaplugin.dll.

So we have really simple workaround for Alpha1:
go to
%INSTALL_DIR_LO_ALPHA1%\URE\misc\javavendors.xml

replace
<library vendor="Sun Microsystems
Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>
<library vendor="Oracle
Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>
<library vendor="IBM
Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>

libsunjavaplugin.dll through sunjavaplugin.dll :

<library vendor="Sun Microsystems
Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>
<library vendor="Oracle
Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>
<library vendor="IBM
Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>

LO -> Java Bridge is working now.

Patch attached and bz is updated.

Regards
David

> What do you think about an alpha2?
>
> More details and a poll here:
> <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/>
>
>
> Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by
> comment in the blog!
>
> Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2.
>
> Best regards
>
> Rainer
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

0001-fdo-48946-URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR-libsunjavaplugin.dll-.patch (1K) Download Attachment
Fridrich Strba-3 Fridrich Strba-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: [PUSHED] fdo#48946 was: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

Pushed, thanks for it. Just wondering what went wrong. Did the
gbuildification of the module change the library name?

Anyway, thanks for tracking it down

F.

On 03/06/12 13:50, David Ostrovsky wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
>> that version because of  “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we
>> will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.
>>
> I looked at it and it turns out, that it is failing in
> jvmfwk/source/fwkbase.cxx:181 with:
>
> The file: vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll
> does not exist."
> But the Library is called sunjavaplugin.dll and not libsunjavaplugin.dll.
>
> So we have really simple workaround for Alpha1:
> go to
> %INSTALL_DIR_LO_ALPHA1%\URE\misc\javavendors.xml
>
> replace
> <library vendor="Sun Microsystems
> Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>
>
> <library vendor="Oracle
> Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>
>
> <library vendor="IBM
> Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library>
>
>
> libsunjavaplugin.dll through sunjavaplugin.dll :
>
> <library vendor="Sun Microsystems
> Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>
> <library vendor="Oracle
> Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>
>
> <library vendor="IBM
> Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library>
>
>
> LO -> Java Bridge is working now.
>
> Patch attached and bz is updated.
>
> Regards
> David
>
>> What do you think about an alpha2?
>>
>> More details and a poll here:
>> <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/>
>>
>>
>> Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by
>> comment in the blog!
>>
>> Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2.
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Rainer
>> _______________________________________________
>> LibreOffice mailing list
>> [hidden email]
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Fridrich Strba-3 Fridrich Strba-3
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

In reply to this post by Rainer Bielefeld-2
Rainer,

Getting a build out of the door is a non-trivial amount of work. There
is no way we want to block resources like this just 2 days before
feature freeze. It will for sure be fixed in beta1, and with the
work-arounds that are floating around, one should be able to test alpha1
too.

Cheers

F.

On 03/06/12 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:

> Hi,
>
> we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
> that version because of  “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we
> will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.
>
> What do you think about an alpha2?
>
> More details and a poll here:
> <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/>
>
>
> Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by
> comment in the blog!
>
> Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2.
>
> Best regards
>
> Rainer
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> [hidden email]
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Cor Nouws Cor Nouws
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate
star

Re: Testing 3.6.0alpha1

In reply to this post by Rainer Bielefeld-2
Hi Rainer,

Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-06-12 13:27)
> we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests”
> that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will
> any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1.

I thought we had introduced the alpha-builds to identify this kind of
problems, so that testing of the next builds can be done by the most
users without so much hurdles.
So I would say that this alpha is successful :-)

Cheers,

--
  - Cor
  - http://nl.libreoffice.org

_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Loading...