|
Rainer Bielefeld-2 |
|
|
Hi,
we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. What do you think about an alpha2? More details and a poll here: <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/> Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by comment in the blog! Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2. Best regards Rainer _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
David Ostrovsky |
|
|
Hi,
On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” > that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we > will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. > I looked at it and it turns out, that it is failing in jvmfwk/source/fwkbase.cxx:181 with: The file: vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll does not exist." But the Library is called sunjavaplugin.dll and not libsunjavaplugin.dll. So we have really simple workaround for Alpha1: go to %INSTALL_DIR_LO_ALPHA1%\URE\misc\javavendors.xml replace <library vendor="Sun Microsystems Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> <library vendor="Oracle Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> <library vendor="IBM Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> libsunjavaplugin.dll through sunjavaplugin.dll : <library vendor="Sun Microsystems Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> <library vendor="Oracle Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> <library vendor="IBM Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> LO -> Java Bridge is working now. Patch attached and bz is updated. Regards David > What do you think about an alpha2? > > More details and a poll here: > <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/> > > > Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by > comment in the blog! > > Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2. > > Best regards > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
Fridrich Strba-3 |
|
|
Pushed, thanks for it. Just wondering what went wrong. Did the
gbuildification of the module change the library name? Anyway, thanks for tracking it down F. On 03/06/12 13:50, David Ostrovsky wrote: > Hi, > > On 03.06.2012 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: >> Hi, >> >> we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” >> that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we >> will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. >> > I looked at it and it turns out, that it is failing in > jvmfwk/source/fwkbase.cxx:181 with: > > The file: vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll > does not exist." > But the Library is called sunjavaplugin.dll and not libsunjavaplugin.dll. > > So we have really simple workaround for Alpha1: > go to > %INSTALL_DIR_LO_ALPHA1%\URE\misc\javavendors.xml > > replace > <library vendor="Sun Microsystems > Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> > > <library vendor="Oracle > Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> > > <library vendor="IBM > Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/libsunjavaplugin.dll</library> > > > libsunjavaplugin.dll through sunjavaplugin.dll : > > <library vendor="Sun Microsystems > Inc.">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> > <library vendor="Oracle > Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> > > <library vendor="IBM > Corporation">vnd.sun.star.expand:$URE_INTERNAL_LIB_DIR/sunjavaplugin.dll</library> > > > LO -> Java Bridge is working now. > > Patch attached and bz is updated. > > Regards > David > >> What do you think about an alpha2? >> >> More details and a poll here: >> <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/> >> >> >> Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by >> comment in the blog! >> >> Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2. >> >> Best regards >> >> Rainer >> _______________________________________________ >> LibreOffice mailing list >> [hidden email] >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice > > > > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
Fridrich Strba-3 |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rainer Bielefeld-2
Rainer,
Getting a build out of the door is a non-trivial amount of work. There is no way we want to block resources like this just 2 days before feature freeze. It will for sure be fixed in beta1, and with the work-arounds that are floating around, one should be able to test alpha1 too. Cheers F. On 03/06/12 13:27, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Hi, > > we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” > that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we > will any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. > > What do you think about an alpha2? > > More details and a poll here: > <http://rrbd.wordpress.com/2012/06/03/testing-3-6-0alpha1/> > > > Discussion please at <[hidden email]> or by > comment in the blog! > > Of course I can not promise that that we will get an alpha2. > > Best regards > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > LibreOffice mailing list > [hidden email] > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
|
In reply to this post by Rainer Bielefeld-2
Hi Rainer,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (03-06-12 13:27) > we were not lucky, most users will not be able to do “real life tests” > that version because of “Bug 48946 – not find JRE”. I doubt that we will > any Bug report for that version because of tests with Alpha1. I thought we had introduced the alpha-builds to identify this kind of problems, so that testing of the next builds can be done by the most users without so much hurdles. So I would say that this alpha is successful :-) Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |