|
Riccardo Magliocchetti |
|
|
Hello,
with the latest patches i pushed today i'm (finally :) able to compile / install / convert some documents with --enable-headless switch. I've added some documentation to the wiki [1], still in Development because it is really not ready for general use i think. So i would like to thanks all libo developers especially mmeeks, matus and tml for their support / help with patches. thanks, riccardo [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/HeadlessBuild _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
Tomáš Chvátal-2 |
|
|
Dne Čt 31. května 2012 21:04:21, Riccardo Magliocchetti napsal(a):
> Hello, > > with the latest patches i pushed today i'm (finally :) able to compile / > install / convert some documents with --enable-headless switch. > > I've added some documentation to the wiki [1], still in Development > because it is really not ready for general use i think. > > So i would like to thanks all libo developers especially mmeeks, matus > and tml for their support / help with patches. > > thanks, > riccardo > > [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/HeadlessBuild Just one question, are all the dependencies properly nested in the configure.in? Lets say I am dumb and I want to call something like ./configure --enable- headless --enable-kde and expect the configure to pick for me that headless has priority there. Basically reason is that I want to implement this in our Gentoo ebuild and for that I have to trust the configure to decide it properly or patch it myself by use dependencies (eg stating "If having headless enabled you have to disable gtk, kde, gnome, ...") which in return requires users to do more work before getting the package to build. Cheers Tom _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
Tor Lillqvist-2 |
|
|
> Lets say I am dumb and I want to call something like ./configure --enable-
> headless --enable-kde and expect the configure to pick for me that headless has > priority there. I don't think we will ever be able to completely specify a 100% correct relationship between options, what options make others meaningless, what ones conflict, etc etc. That's what this mailing list is for, so people who try some stupid combination can ask why it doesn't work even if the configure script didn't complain;) --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
|
Riccardo Magliocchetti |
|
|
In reply to this post by Tomáš Chvátal-2
Hello,
Il 31/05/2012 22:50, Tomáš Chvátal ha scritto: > Dne Čt 31. května 2012 21:04:21, Riccardo Magliocchetti napsal(a): >> with the latest patches i pushed today i'm (finally :) able to compile / >> install / convert some documents with --enable-headless switch. >> [snip] >> [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/HeadlessBuild > > Just one question, are all the dependencies properly nested in the > configure.in? Nope, if you look at [1] above there are a ton of --disable switches, some of them have already a test_* variable in configure so we can do something for them. > Lets say I am dumb and I want to call something like ./configure --enable- > headless --enable-kde and expect the configure to pick for me that headless has > priority there. As Tor said you cannot avoid completely this kind of issues, my idea is towards making it easy to build headless but don't want clutter configure.in with tons of headless specific conditionals. > Basically reason is that I want to implement this in our Gentoo ebuild and for > that I have to trust the configure to decide it properly or patch it myself by > use dependencies (eg stating "If having headless enabled you have to disable > gtk, kde, gnome, ...") which in return requires users to do more work before > getting the package to build. I think it is a bit early for that kind of exposure :) thanks, riccardo _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [hidden email] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice |
| Powered by Nabble | Edit this page |